Dick Cheney on why invading Iraq would be a bad idea.

I was having a conversation with a more conservative friend of mine the other night about why I opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq. I think Dick Cheney himself very eloquently stated the reasons why toppling Saddam would be a bad idea while defending his decision not to at a Seattle conference in 1992:

I would guess if we had gone in there, I would still have forces in Baghdad today. We'd be running the country. We would not have been able to get everybody out and bring everybody home.

And the final point that I think needs to be made is this question of casualties. I don't think you could have done all of that without significant additional U.S. casualties. And while everybody was tremendously impressed with the low cost of the (1991) conflict, for the 146 Americans who were killed in action and for their families, it wasn't a cheap war.

And the question in my mind is how many additional American casualties is Saddam (Hussein) worth? And the answer is not that damned many. So, I think we got it right, both when we decided to expel him
from Kuwait, but also when the president made the decision that we'd achieved our objectives and we were not going to go get bogged down in the problems of trying to take over and govern Iraq.

Spooky how well he called his own quagmire, isn't it?